-
Use JS redirects? Take a look at this!
Seems that Google is now contacting webmasters to let them know about violations to the guidelines...
Someone posted a case where he got banned for using doorways with JS redirects.
Very interesting...
http://www.searchengineforums.com/ap....forums/action::thread/thread::1126256843/forum::google/type::mythreads/
-
Use JS redirects? Take a look at this!
Some more here...
http://www.threadwatch.org/node/3843#comment-23690
-
Use JS redirects? Take a look at this!
It's about time
I'm glad to see it's the "reputable" sites they will try and help before they give them the axe.
-
Use JS redirects? Take a look at this!
Yeah no kidding. Good to see them getting a hold of the situation.
-
Use JS redirects? Take a look at this!
Hopefully it's the first step in Google treating webmasters a little more like the partners they are.
-
Use JS redirects? Take a look at this!
I like how some people on threadwatch want to classify google sending a targetted letter to a domain as spam.
I am sure they can provide an opt out option for those who want to be dropped from Google with no notice.
-
Use JS redirects? Take a look at this!
Interesting threads. Opens up an issue though that could case problems for Google.
Who determines what is 'legitimate' domain? Legitimate content? Legitimate site? If my buddy Fred gets an email and I don't, who made that call?
Seems the who gets notice and who doesn't would be way too subjective and potentially even provide an avenue for legal action.
The whole idea of an automated search engine is to provide impartial results and essentially take subjective influence out of the process. Personally, I think my sites provide a useful service. But I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who don't, and some of them probably work for Google.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks